The FDA is scheduled to reconsider a 20+ year ban on blood donations from MSM (men who have sex with men). It's so easy and commonplace to screen for HIV these days that a ban is just not necessary. I, for one, hope they do reconsider and lift the ban. Blood products are too precious and scarce to keep millions of people from not donating.
Some students got inaccurately low SAT scores due to a computer glitch. Too bad I didn't have the same problem with my Step 1 score. Then again, maybe I'll have that happen to my step 2 score this summer! Gotta think positive :)
But at least Wal-mart is carrying Plan B now. One step forward, fifty steps back.
Because imagine this: it's not ethical to give people synthetic goo that may or may not help them when you've got real blood lying around that you KNOW will help them. At least, not without their consent.
What's a little strange is the study design in general, which seems to have, somehow, somewhere, skipped a few stages, unless I'm just totally missing the point here. Seems like that you could test synthetic blood on somebody other than people that are getting ready to die and prove clinical efficacy. Being as this is a CNN article and I'm tired, I might be behind the times on Polyheme. Polyheme, according to Wikipedia, is a solution of chemically modified human hemoglobin which simultaneously restores lost blood volume and hemoglobin levels and is designed for rapid, massive infusion.
God knows it'd kick ass if this stuff worked out, and it probably will (sometime in the next 20 years, hopefully sooner than later).
And then all the sinners will have to find something else to do instead of donating blood to make them feel better about their wretched lives.
According to its website:
PolyHeme’s characteristics include:
So it might not be obvious to most people, but participating in a state sanctioned execution is medically unethical. The AMA (that liberal bastion of socialists) and numerous other organizations have recognized this for years. And so when a Federal judge ordered anesthesiologists be present at the execution of Michael Morales, he was essentially asking for a doctor with no scruples. Fortunately, the two anesthesiologists present refused to participate and the execution had to be delayed. Once again, anesthesiologists help save (or at least prolong) a life and praises go unsung. But I'd like to say to those two physicians, you are my heroes.
We've all gotten an e-mail and questioned the tone, were they being funny or angry or what? Well, apparently confusion regarding e-mail is not uncommon.
According to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I've only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they've correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time.
The researchers took 30 pairs of undergraduate students and gave each one a list of 20 statements about topics like campus food or the weather. Assuming either a serious or sarcastic tone, one member of each pair e-mailed the statements to his or her partner. The partners then guessed the intended tone and indicated how confident they were in their answers.
"People often think the tone or emotion in their messages is obvious because they 'hear' the tone they intend in their head as they write," Epley explains.
At the same time, those reading messages unconsciously interpret them based on their current mood, stereotypes and expectations. Despite this, the research subjects thought they accurately interpreted the messages nine out of 10 times.
The reason for this is egocentrism, or the difficulty some people have detaching themselves from their own perspective, says Epley. In other words, people aren't that good at imagining how a message might be understood from another person's perspective.
If anybody's got a theological interest and an interest in film or literature or obscure music, you might be able to help me with my upcoming essay...
update: the link is fixed
In this week's edition of "America Misses the F@#$!ing Point":Twenty-one percent of the 1,000 adults who replied to the survey conducted Thursday through Sunday said it was very likely or somewhat likely their conversations had been wiretapped, while 52 percent said it was not at all likely.
Twenty-four percent said it was not too likely.
Vegetarian Times this month features the Asthma Friendly Bear, which is currently sold out from Learning Express. But goshdarnit, Target has a whole slew of Asthma Friendly animals, including Asthma Friendly Yellow Lab.
Your dog wants Claritin.
Every wonder what your major is worth? Want to know whether you should have sucked it up and taken that course in advanced theoretical mathematical analysis instead of underwater basket-weaving? Well, lucky for you, CNN Money gives us a handy list of the most lucrative majors.
Apparently, I graduated from a top 10 university with the 2nd most lucrative major out there. Instead of making money and enjoying life, I get to be called in to the hospital at 4 a.m. to draw blood and cut sutures 2 mm long (not 4 mm, DAMNIT!). I want to cry.
Not to steal Garrett's thunder (see photo post below), but this article by Andy Borowitz describing the government's response to Cheney's accident was too funny not to link to. It's about damn time, I say.
Maybe it's just that I have this fantasy that preventive medicine is cheaper, more efficient, and makes people's lives suck less. And maybe I just like filling out forms. But I get really excited about questionaires that actually have useful predictive value, because questionaires are cheap, easy to organize, and give people stuff to do for that hour they're waiting on you in the waiting room instead of sorting through your old copies of the Placebo Journal.
Asking the right questions may allow doctors to tell whether a young woman is heading for an eating disorder, a new study suggests.According to the article, those who progressed to an eating disorder were much more likely to say they often ate "in secret" or frequently wanted to feel they had an "empty stomach." They also showed a greater preoccupation with food or their body shape, and more often feared they would "lose control" of their eating.
British researchers found that by giving young female dieters a questionnaire about their eating habits, they were able to accurately predict which ones would develop an eating disorder more than 70 percent of the time...
...The findings, according to Fairburn's team, suggest that a similar brief questionnaire could be used as part of young women's routine healthcare. Doctors could then target high-risk patients for prevention, or at least follow-up with them at subsequent visits.
JibJab's latest Bush parody year-end-roundup video clip deserves some love and attention even if it is early February.
Being victimized in this study includes being involved in physical fights, getting shot or stabbed, or playing for the Indiana Pacers."There is something unique about early maturity (relative to one's peers) that opens opportunities for victimization experiences," the study's authors write.
As a boy who was fully pimpled in third grade and had a full beard in seventh grade, I have to report I was never drafted by the Indiana Pacers.
"It's not puberty that is what ultimately causes kids to get victimized," study co-author Dr. Alex Piquero, a criminologist at the University of Florida, told Reuters Health. "Early puberty seems to open up a different set of doors and social experiences to kids," he said, explaining that early maturing youngsters may start socializing with the opposite sex and with older, bigger, and stronger youth earlier than those who do not experience puberty early.
"Just like when people date," he said, "it opens up a world of different sets of people that they've never interacted with."
It is well known that young people who experience puberty early have a higher risk of depression, substance use, disruptive behaviors and various other conditions, yet researchers had not before investigated whether these youth were also more susceptible to victimization.
This particular study doesn't seem to address some of the physiologic consequences of early versus late puberty, which seem particulary significant for girls, as girls who experience puberty later tend to have the slimmer physiques of Cosmopolitan, while girls who experience puberty earlier tend to have the ghetto booties of MTV Jams.
Guys like me who went through super-early puberty simply get tired of shaving by the age of 19 and grow furry beards and wear lots of flannel.
Of course, this only applies to folk who had their drug offenses BEFORE they went to college, which is still absurd. But even incremental decreases in absurdity should be praised in this country nowadays.
say the folks at Slate, who make a pretty strong case that Detroit isn't moving in any positive direction any time soon.
SBXL may be in Detroit, but the action is still between these 14 critters in Animal Planet's Puppy Bowl II. Last year it was on pretty much all day before the Super Bowl, and totally worth every minute. At least watch long enough to see a flag thrown when Sheeba the Shiba Inu takes a crap on the thirty yard line.
And you know I'm not kidding.
While the House is busy distracting everyone by popping a Boehner, they're also hitting poor folk with a moneyshot.
The spending bill, which covers a five-year period ending in 2010, will achieve savings of $6.4 billion in Medicare, the health care program for the elderly, through a variety of changes that include higher premiums for all beneficiaries, with steeper increases for the more affluent and a freeze in payments to home health care providers.Apparently the GOP thinks the best way to make problems with health care go away is to just get rid of health care all together. Who needs meds when you've got tax cuts?
In the Medicaid health care program for the poor and disabled, $4.8 billion will be saved in part by increasing co-payments and reducing payments for prescription drugs.
